MLB Draft, 2021

User avatar
Edgy MD
Posts: 29536
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 3:36 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD, USA
Contact:

Re: MLB Draft, 2021

Post by Edgy MD » Sun Aug 01, 2021 12:43 pm

Well, trades this week wouldn't have involved players just drafted. But yes, they saved elsewhere to pay the bonus on Rocker. They'll get a compensaiton pick in the same spot in 2022, but whether that money can be invested elsewise, I can only hope.
A Shaolin monk does not sell himself for a handful of rice.
User avatar
bmfc1
Posts: 4008
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 1:49 pm

Re: MLB Draft, 2021

Post by bmfc1 » Sun Aug 01, 2021 2:07 pm

Listen to Jon:

User avatar
batmagadanleadoff
Posts: 8032
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 10:43 am

Re: MLB Draft, 2021

Post by batmagadanleadoff » Sun Aug 01, 2021 4:48 pm

bmfc1 wrote: Sun Aug 01, 2021 12:35 pm Today is the deadline to sign your draft picks and Jeff Passan says that as of now the Mets will .... If that's true, it hurts the farm system and we heard that the Mets had trouble making more trades this week because they didn't have enough second-level players to deal.
Granted that the future s unknown and we don't know how this draft will ultimately turn out, but right now, this year's Mets draft is looking like an unmitigated disaster with bad ripple effects, like the one you mentioned, beyond not signing Rocker.

I wonder what the precise issue is with Rocker for the Mets not to sign him? Because money is no longer a Mets problem. We'll find out soon enough.
User avatar
bmfc1
Posts: 4008
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 1:49 pm

Re: MLB Draft, 2021

Post by bmfc1 » Sun Aug 01, 2021 5:05 pm

Maybe he'll turn out like Brady Aiken.
Maybe the extra pick they get next year (at 11) will turn into a star.
But for now, this is a disaster.

From Scott Boras:

User avatar
seawolf17
Posts: 1556
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2019 10:52 am

Re: MLB Draft, 2021

Post by seawolf17 » Sun Aug 01, 2021 5:17 pm

The Mets effing up this pick is so very Mets.
User avatar
bmfc1
Posts: 4008
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 1:49 pm

Re: MLB Draft, 2021

Post by bmfc1 » Sun Aug 01, 2021 5:30 pm

I'd like to know if the Mets drastically lowered their offer based on his medicals or if they withdrew their offer and closed the door. If they offered him 50 cents on the dollar and Boras declined that's his decision as Rocker is out of baseball and any $ for a year. Rocker didn't submit an MRI before the draft so the Mets drafted him based on what they knew which was not everything. I hope that the Mets are wrong and that Rocker is healthy but before everyone gets all "LOL Mets" we should consider that there is a scenario (which the Mets might not be able to talk about) where they were shocked at what they saw.

Good information (at least to me) about the draft process here: https://www.mlb.com/mets/news/kumar-roc ... -with-mets
Last edited by bmfc1 on Sun Aug 01, 2021 6:42 pm, edited 3 times in total.
User avatar
Benjamin Grimm
Posts: 7489
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2018 3:01 pm

Re: MLB Draft, 2021

Post by Benjamin Grimm » Sun Aug 01, 2021 6:35 pm

Well, that was fun while it lasted.

I guess.
User avatar
Frayed Knot
Posts: 13443
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 3:12 pm

Re: MLB Draft, 2021

Post by Frayed Knot » Sun Aug 01, 2021 6:48 pm

"Baseball draft picks are worth up to 5x their slot value to clubs .I never shy away from investments that can make me that type of return."

Not sure the owners are going to be happy with Uncle Steve going public with that sort of information.
Posting Covid-19 free since March of 2020
User avatar
bmfc1
Posts: 4008
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 1:49 pm

Re: MLB Draft, 2021

Post by bmfc1 » Sun Aug 01, 2021 7:59 pm

“The Mets made no offer, ever,” following the physical, a source said.

The reasons for that might be speculated on elsewhere. They won’t be here. Suffice to say that what has been rumored is either incomplete or inaccurate.
https://sny.tv/articles/sources-mets-ku ... over-money
User avatar
ashie62
Posts: 5328
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: MLB Draft, 2021

Post by ashie62 » Sun Aug 01, 2021 8:03 pm

They get an extra pick in the 1st round next year.

I don't see this as a real problem for the now.

They can add that pick to the one they will get for Conforto.
Diabetic Squirrel
User avatar
Ceetar
Posts: 3133
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2019 4:35 pm
Location: leaning on a stool somewhere
Contact:

Re: MLB Draft, 2021

Post by Ceetar » Sun Aug 01, 2021 8:13 pm

well, they should extend Conforto.

There's no reason to think a pick a year from now is going to help the Mets MORE than having Rocker now. It makes no sense, it is dumb and yet another example of how confused this front office is.
Please listen to my podcast? You Did What Now?

Please listen to our podcast? Mets On Tap

www.ceetar.com/optimisticmetsfan

Barley Prose
User avatar
Frayed Knot
Posts: 13443
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 3:12 pm

Re: MLB Draft, 2021

Post by Frayed Knot » Sun Aug 01, 2021 8:20 pm

Ceetar wrote: Sun Aug 01, 2021 8:13 pm It makes no sense, it is dumb and yet another example of how confused this front office is.
It makes a whole lot of sense if they have reason to think he's damaged goods.
Posting Covid-19 free since March of 2020
User avatar
Ceetar
Posts: 3133
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2019 4:35 pm
Location: leaning on a stool somewhere
Contact:

Re: MLB Draft, 2021

Post by Ceetar » Sun Aug 01, 2021 8:27 pm

Frayed Knot wrote: Sun Aug 01, 2021 8:20 pm
Ceetar wrote: Sun Aug 01, 2021 8:13 pm It makes no sense, it is dumb and yet another example of how confused this front office is.
It makes a whole lot of sense if they have reason to think he's damaged goods.
He'd have to be basically immobile. They've have to be convinced he had zero chance to make the majors. And where did they discover this information in a scant few weeks? That just means they failed doing their research the first time.
Please listen to my podcast? You Did What Now?

Please listen to our podcast? Mets On Tap

www.ceetar.com/optimisticmetsfan

Barley Prose
User avatar
batmagadanleadoff
Posts: 8032
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 10:43 am

Re: MLB Draft, 2021

Post by batmagadanleadoff » Sun Aug 01, 2021 8:28 pm

ashie62 wrote: Sun Aug 01, 2021 8:03 pm They get an extra pick in the 1st round next year.

I don't see this as a real problem for the now.
Unless the Mets knowingly selected "lesser" players than what was available in subsequent rounds based on some budget that accounted for signing Rocker. They won't make that up and so it looks like they're now a year behind in prospect acquisition and development. Prospects are currency as much as currency is. Brett Baty is the only Mets #1 draft pick still in their minor league system - the Mets having traded 2018's Jared Kelenic and 2020's Pete Crow-Armstrong.
User avatar
batmagadanleadoff
Posts: 8032
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 10:43 am

Re: MLB Draft, 2021

Post by batmagadanleadoff » Sun Aug 01, 2021 8:30 pm

Ceetar wrote: Sun Aug 01, 2021 8:27 pmAnd where did they discover this information in a scant few weeks?

Medical records, natch. It does seem odd that with so many millions of dollars at stake for each player, that the players don't have to submit medical records that would go into a common pool for the teams to examine prior to the draft.
User avatar
Ceetar
Posts: 3133
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2019 4:35 pm
Location: leaning on a stool somewhere
Contact:

Re: MLB Draft, 2021

Post by Ceetar » Sun Aug 01, 2021 8:31 pm

batmagadanleadoff wrote: Sun Aug 01, 2021 8:30 pm
Ceetar wrote: Sun Aug 01, 2021 8:27 pmAnd where did they discover this information in a scant few weeks?

Medical records, natch. It does seem odd that with so many millions of dollars at stake for each player, that the players don't have to submit medical records that would go into a common pool for the teams to examine prior to the draft.
Boras disagrees. Maybe he's lying, but it doesn't seem like something he'd out and out lie about.
Please listen to my podcast? You Did What Now?

Please listen to our podcast? Mets On Tap

www.ceetar.com/optimisticmetsfan

Barley Prose
User avatar
batmagadanleadoff
Posts: 8032
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 10:43 am

Re: MLB Draft, 2021

Post by batmagadanleadoff » Sun Aug 01, 2021 8:35 pm

Ceetar wrote: Sun Aug 01, 2021 8:31 pm
batmagadanleadoff wrote: Sun Aug 01, 2021 8:30 pm
Ceetar wrote: Sun Aug 01, 2021 8:27 pmAnd where did they discover this information in a scant few weeks?

Medical records, natch. It does seem odd that with so many millions of dollars at stake for each player, that the players don't have to submit medical records that would go into a common pool for the teams to examine prior to the draft.
Boras disagrees. Maybe he's lying, but it doesn't seem like something he'd out and out lie about.
I don't know how truthful Boras is being but his response didn't surprise me in the least. In fact, I expected it. He's simply representing his client's interests (and by extension, Boras's own interests).
User avatar
bmfc1
Posts: 4008
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 1:49 pm

Re: MLB Draft, 2021

Post by bmfc1 » Sun Aug 01, 2021 8:37 pm

A player doesn't have to submit to a pre-draft medical exam unless he wants to and if he does and is drafted the team that picks him must offer at least 40% of the slot value (even if they don't want to). Rocker did not consent so the Mets did not have all of the information pre-draft that they did post-draft. I suspect that Steve Cohen will only want to "invest" in players that allow for a pre-draft exam.
User avatar
batmagadanleadoff
Posts: 8032
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 10:43 am

Re: MLB Draft, 2021

Post by batmagadanleadoff » Sun Aug 01, 2021 8:41 pm

bmfc1 wrote: Sun Aug 01, 2021 8:37 pm A player doesn't have to submit to a pre-draft medical exam unless he wants to ....
Odd, isn't it?
User avatar
batmagadanleadoff
Posts: 8032
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 10:43 am

Re: MLB Draft, 2021

Post by batmagadanleadoff » Sun Aug 01, 2021 8:43 pm

bmfc1 wrote: Sun Aug 01, 2021 8:37 pmI suspect that Steve Cohen will only want to "invest" in players that allow for a pre-draft exam.

And maybe some other owners too after this Rocker saga.
User avatar
Ceetar
Posts: 3133
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2019 4:35 pm
Location: leaning on a stool somewhere
Contact:

Re: MLB Draft, 2021

Post by Ceetar » Sun Aug 01, 2021 8:46 pm

Rocker would start tomorrow somewhere if he was on a team. He'd take the ball and pitch. MAYBE the Mets read the medicals as him being a risk (but a sure failure? that's almost never how medicals work, and it's not like the Mets docs are 100% here) but they knew he didn't submit his info AND they knew he was asking for overslot, which seems unlikely if he was worried about something showing.

But even if the Mets were all fine there, they still didn't hedge there bets with that information and have a few other draftees that they could use the (overslot) money earmarked for Rocker on perhaps a better prospect that wanted more money. i.e. some lower guy that would sign for 1.5 but not .5. If you lose that guy because Rocker signs, fine. Instead they pissed it away.
Please listen to my podcast? You Did What Now?

Please listen to our podcast? Mets On Tap

www.ceetar.com/optimisticmetsfan

Barley Prose
User avatar
Frayed Knot
Posts: 13443
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 3:12 pm

Re: MLB Draft, 2021

Post by Frayed Knot » Sun Aug 01, 2021 9:02 pm

Ceetar wrote: Sun Aug 01, 2021 8:27 pm He'd have to be basically immobile. They've have to be convinced he had zero chance to make the majors.
No, they just may have been convinced they could do better next year. A player doesn't have to be borderline crippled before you choose to take a different path. Remember the adage from MONEYBALL, it's easier to recover from the player you fail to sign than it is to recover from the one you sign at the wrong price.



"And where did they discover this information in a scant few weeks?"

Ummm, during a physical exam.



"That just means they failed doing their research the first time."

No, if means they had the exclusive ability to check him out medically, something that was denied to them prior to draft day.
Posting Covid-19 free since March of 2020
User avatar
Edgy MD
Posts: 29536
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 3:36 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD, USA
Contact:

Re: MLB Draft, 2021

Post by Edgy MD » Sun Aug 01, 2021 9:38 pm

Ceetar wrote: Sun Aug 01, 2021 8:13 pmThere's no reason to think a pick a year from now is going to help the Mets MORE than having Rocker now. It makes no sense, it is dumb and yet another example of how confused this front office is.
There is no reason that you know of.

The "he'd have to be basically immobile" argument isn't really serious, is it?
A Shaolin monk does not sell himself for a handful of rice.
User avatar
Fman99
Posts: 5868
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2018 2:43 pm

Re: MLB Draft, 2021

Post by Fman99 » Sun Aug 01, 2021 9:58 pm

What a big shitty mess.
User avatar
Ceetar
Posts: 3133
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2019 4:35 pm
Location: leaning on a stool somewhere
Contact:

Re: MLB Draft, 2021

Post by Ceetar » Sun Aug 01, 2021 10:12 pm

Even if we ignore the "humans as commodities" thing and pretend that "Let's just draft someone else next year" isn't extremely subjective, they still pissed away the overcap money, meaning they drafted a guy without seeing his medicals WITHOUT a plan in place should they not like them. They clearly weren't prepared NOT to sign him. Being surprised about it is no excuse, that's their job. See also: Sandy's quote about being surprised what pitching went for at the traded deadline (this year, previous years, you pick, he says the same thing every time. He's a grouchy old man complaining about prices these days, and it shows)

It's inarguable that they were unprepared.
Please listen to my podcast? You Did What Now?

Please listen to our podcast? Mets On Tap

www.ceetar.com/optimisticmetsfan

Barley Prose
Post Reply