The Pete Alonso Conundrum

User avatar
smg58
Posts: 1207
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 8:19 am

Re: The Pete Alonso Conundrum

Post by smg58 » Sun Dec 22, 2024 7:37 am

According to Fangraphs, all the first basemen who moved in the last two days except Goldschmidt had a higher WAR last year than Alonso. If he was asking for significantly more than what any of these other players got, I'm not surprised that the other teams looking for first base help all went elsewhere. There was only one team who might value him that much, and right now they appear to be bidding against themselves.

I'd hold firm at the 3 and 60 that Walker got. Walker is older, but he's been the better player each of the last three years.
User avatar
kcmets
Posts: 11656
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2018 7:36 pm
Location: Hangin' with Bing [Bot]

Re: The Pete Alonso Conundrum

Post by kcmets » Sun Dec 22, 2024 3:44 pm

MFS62 wrote: Sat Dec 21, 2024 12:25 pmSwimming pool.
Swimming pool what? Jesus, just spell it out...
#lgm #ygb #ymdyf
User avatar
Lefty Specialist
Posts: 5953
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 5:36 pm

Re: The Pete Alonso Conundrum

Post by Lefty Specialist » Sun Dec 22, 2024 6:26 pm

Gwreck wrote: Sun Dec 22, 2024 1:22 am Bregman to third/Vientos to first is still probably the best alternative if they don’t sign Pete. After that? It gets much less desirable.
That wouldn't be terrible, and the threat of Bregman might also entice Pete into something a little more team-friendly both in length and $.
The answer to the question "Can people really be that stupid?" is always "Yes."
User avatar
Centerfield
Posts: 3130
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 9:28 am

Re: The Pete Alonso Conundrum

Post by Centerfield » Sun Dec 22, 2024 7:40 pm

Nathaniel Lowe traded to Washington.

Nats now out on Alonso.
User avatar
Benjamin Grimm
Posts: 8764
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2018 3:01 pm

Re: The Pete Alonso Conundrum

Post by Benjamin Grimm » Sun Dec 22, 2024 8:16 pm

I really hope the Mets lock down Pete before the New Year.
User avatar
Edgy MD
Posts: 32862
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 3:36 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD, USA
Contact:

Re: The Pete Alonso Conundrum

Post by Edgy MD » Sun Dec 22, 2024 9:58 pm

Centerfield wrote: Sun Dec 22, 2024 7:40 pm Nathaniel Lowe traded to Washington.

Nats now out on Alonso.
But are the Rangers really going with Jake Burger?

I guess so, but ... well, Pete Alonso is surely better than that guy.
User avatar
Centerfield
Posts: 3130
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 9:28 am

Re: The Pete Alonso Conundrum

Post by Centerfield » Tue Dec 24, 2024 12:35 pm

So Alonso won’t be signed by Christmas. Which probably means nothing will change until January.

I’d love to see where the parties stand as of now. I’d guess the Alonso camp is now in “what deal can we take and save face” mode.
User avatar
MFS62
Posts: 9820
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 8:08 am

Re: The Pete Alonso Conundrum

Post by MFS62 » Tue Dec 24, 2024 12:54 pm

C'mon, Pete. Sign the contract under your tree and give all of us a present.
Do it for the little children.
Please.

Later
I'm paranoid. But am I paranoid enough?
"Never underestimate the power of stupid people in a large group". George Carlin
I have never insulted anyone. I simply describe them, accurately.
User avatar
whippoorwill
Posts: 4840
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 5:17 pm

Re: The Pete Alonso Conundrum

Post by whippoorwill » Tue Dec 24, 2024 1:01 pm

And us big kids
User avatar
Bob Alpacadaca
Posts: 447
Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2021 9:21 pm

Re: The Pete Alonso Conundrum

Post by Bob Alpacadaca » Tue Dec 24, 2024 2:17 pm

Saw a report that the Mets are offering a three-year, $90 million deal with a player opt out after each year. Same report says Boras is asking for $200 million.
User avatar
metirish
Posts: 5152
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 12:50 pm

Re: The Pete Alonso Conundrum

Post by metirish » Tue Dec 24, 2024 4:09 pm

If Boras can get Pete #200 million then good for them
User avatar
Frayed Knot
Posts: 15145
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 3:12 pm

Re: The Pete Alonso Conundrum

Post by Frayed Knot » Tue Dec 24, 2024 5:06 pm

I think it's entirely possible that some team swoops in and offers Pete more $$/yrs than the Mets are willing to match.
I don't have a specific team in mind but there may be one or two out there.
But it's hard to see how such a team is going to have to go near $200 mil in order to pull it off.
Posting Covid-19 free since March of 2020
User avatar
Benjamin Grimm
Posts: 8764
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2018 3:01 pm

Re: The Pete Alonso Conundrum

Post by Benjamin Grimm » Tue Dec 24, 2024 5:15 pm

Pete may have had a chance at $200 million two years ago, but I don't see it happening now.
User avatar
Frayed Knot
Posts: 15145
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 3:12 pm

Re: The Pete Alonso Conundrum

Post by Frayed Knot » Tue Dec 24, 2024 5:25 pm

And, as if on cue, Puma in the Post lists the ...

- Giants, where a combo of Wilmer Flores and Lamont Wade Jr platooned last year. Was their (too?) heavy investment in Willy Adames a $ign of thing$ to come?

- Rangers, coming off a down post-WS year but still in 'win-now' mode with deGrom, Seager, and Semien as their core. Also need to replace just-traded Nathaniel Lowe

- Mariners, who have good pitching but need pop/runs and also had no set 1B-man last year

- Cardinals, need to replace Goldschmidt but don't seem keen to spend a lot

- Angels, who always seem to spend on 'name' players as a way to get to respectability rather than only doing so once they get there

... as potential landing spots for a hungry polar bear.



https://nypost.com/2024/12/24/sports/pe ... s-dwindle/
Posting Covid-19 free since March of 2020
User avatar
MFS62
Posts: 9820
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 8:08 am

Re: The Pete Alonso Conundrum

Post by MFS62 » Tue Dec 24, 2024 5:31 pm

At this point, I don't think the $/yr is the sticking point (probably around $30 million) but the length of contract.
If Pete wants a three year opt out, I'd offer a player or team opt out clause after 3 years and see what happens.
Later
I'm paranoid. But am I paranoid enough?
"Never underestimate the power of stupid people in a large group". George Carlin
I have never insulted anyone. I simply describe them, accurately.
User avatar
Frayed Knot
Posts: 15145
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 3:12 pm

Re: The Pete Alonso Conundrum

Post by Frayed Knot » Tue Dec 24, 2024 6:40 pm

I'm not suggesting it's dollars per year that the Mets won't match but some combo of dollars And yearS combined.
So if the Mets offer 4 x $30 he may go elsewhere for 5 x $30, or 6 x $27, or some similar set-up that the Mets will opt not match/top.
And it's the $200 mil total (in whatever form) that I can't see happening no matter how much Boras wants to trumpet it.
Posting Covid-19 free since March of 2020
User avatar
MFS62
Posts: 9820
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 8:08 am

Re: The Pete Alonso Conundrum

Post by MFS62 » Tue Dec 24, 2024 6:47 pm

Frayed Knot wrote: Tue Dec 24, 2024 6:40 pm And it's the $200 mil total (in whatever form) that I can't see happening no matter how much Boras wants to trumpet it.
I agree. That would be nuts.
Later
I'm paranoid. But am I paranoid enough?
"Never underestimate the power of stupid people in a large group". George Carlin
I have never insulted anyone. I simply describe them, accurately.
User avatar
smg58
Posts: 1207
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 8:19 am

Re: The Pete Alonso Conundrum

Post by smg58 » Wed Dec 25, 2024 11:44 am

If somebody else beats 3 and 90 with opt-outs, they are totally welcome to have him.
User avatar
kcmets
Posts: 11656
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2018 7:36 pm
Location: Hangin' with Bing [Bot]

Re: The Pete Alonso Conundrum

Post by kcmets » Wed Dec 25, 2024 11:55 am

I just saw a phone notification and in the link title it only said,

"Mets slugger Pete Alonso re..."

I was like, holy crap on a holiday... and I had a heart palpitation
or three. But Lucy pulled the football once again and...
#lgm #ygb #ymdyf
User avatar
Edgy MD
Posts: 32862
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 3:36 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD, USA
Contact:

Re: The Pete Alonso Conundrum

Post by Edgy MD » Wed Dec 25, 2024 12:39 pm

See this is how to tackle the market. Boras has a job to get two teams bidding his client up, but Stearns works it so he has two sluggers bidding the Mets down.
User avatar
ashie62
Posts: 6608
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: The Pete Alonso Conundrum

Post by ashie62 » Wed Dec 25, 2024 3:11 pm

I sincerely hope Pete doesn't get left in the cold like Mike Conforto did

It's starting to feel a bit chilly
Diabetic Squirrel
User avatar
Lefty Specialist
Posts: 5953
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 5:36 pm

Re: The Pete Alonso Conundrum

Post by Lefty Specialist » Wed Dec 25, 2024 3:42 pm

ashie62 wrote: Wed Dec 25, 2024 3:11 pm I sincerely hope Pete doesn't get left in the cold like Mike Conforto did

It's starting to feel a bit chilly

Conforto turned down a QO from the Mets then hurt himself. Not left out in the cold but rather stepping into a walk-in fridge and then locking the door.
The answer to the question "Can people really be that stupid?" is always "Yes."
User avatar
Edgy MD
Posts: 32862
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 3:36 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD, USA
Contact:

Re: The Pete Alonso Conundrum

Post by Edgy MD » Wed Dec 25, 2024 4:07 pm

If that $90 million offer is for reals, It beats the socks off of a one-year $21.05 million qualifying offer.
User avatar
Lefty Specialist
Posts: 5953
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 5:36 pm

Re: The Pete Alonso Conundrum

Post by Lefty Specialist » Wed Dec 25, 2024 5:16 pm

MFS62 wrote: Tue Dec 24, 2024 5:31 pm At this point, I don't think the $/yr is the sticking point (probably around $30 million) but the length of contract.
If Pete wants a three year opt out, I'd offer a player or team opt out clause after 3 years and see what happens.
Later
I'd be happy with 3/$90 or even 4/$120. Longer than that and I start to hesitate, especially the way the first base market seems to be crashing. But Alex Bregman is repped by Boras, too, so you can't play one off against the other.
The answer to the question "Can people really be that stupid?" is always "Yes."
User avatar
Frayed Knot
Posts: 15145
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 3:12 pm

Re: The Pete Alonso Conundrum

Post by Frayed Knot » Wed Dec 25, 2024 8:33 pm

Yeah, I don't think you have to limit it to three years less. I was mainly hoping they didn't get bluffed into five and up.

I mean, it sounds odd considering that we're coming off being giddy that they just locked Soto up for the net decade and a half.
And while that is a ridiculous length of time, at least he's 26 years old and a unicorn. Don't have to get crazy twice in one winter.
Posting Covid-19 free since March of 2020
Post Reply