whippoorwill wrote: ↑Thu Sep 26, 2024 9:09 pm
You forgot to divide that by the square root of 1645.15 and subtract the number of rolls of paper towels in all the even numbered office areas
Seriously guys relax and enjoy
Amen!
_______________________
The Athletic summarizes the over 1,000 NL possibilities over the last weekend (including the Dodgers and Padres) and the 64 possibilities for the three teams fighting for the last two NL playoff spots -- the Mets, Braves and DBacks.
https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/579649 ... ibilities/
A few takeaways:
The Mets cannot be eliminated before Monday’s doubleheader;
What would render Monday’s doubleheader completely unnecessary?
There are a couple scenarios in which the National League playoff field is set and seeded by Sunday night. This would require:
• A Royals sweep of the Braves
• The Padres to take two of three from the Diamondbacks
• The Mets to win the series over the Brewers
In these cases, the Padres would host the Mets and the Brewers would host the Diamondbacks. The Braves would be eliminated.
The last time a rescheduled regular-season game after the end of the season determined playoff qualification was 1973, when the Mets won the first game of a doubleheader with the Cubs to clinch the NL East. (The second game was not played.)
Is there a chance of a mutually beneficial split?
[***]
So, is there a chance the Mets and Braves work something out to ensure both teams advance? There are scenarios where that would be the case, if both teams enter Monday with one fewer win than Arizona. However, given the decades-long rivalry between the two franchises, as evidenced by their inability to work out a better contingency plan for these last two games, it’s hard to imagine either side looking at such an arrangement as
mutually beneficial.
No mention of the DBacks recently losing two to the nothing-left-to-play-for Giants. (Deduct two points for critical analysis).