The Pete Alonso Conundrum
- Benjamin Grimm
- Posts: 8764
- Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2018 3:01 pm
Re: The Pete Alonso Conundrum
I hope that's not an accurate take, but if it is, so be it.
- metsmarathon
- Posts: 2230
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 9:35 pm
Re: The Pete Alonso Conundrum
if so, what a colossal failure for both sides to come together.
- Lefty Specialist
- Posts: 5953
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 5:36 pm
Re: The Pete Alonso Conundrum
Don't want to talk about him in the past tense yet, but there was a deal for Alonso to be had. If they didn't get it done, I'll bet it was more on Boras/Alonso than the Mets.
Still need a hitter. Either at 1st/3rd or DH, because the current lineup even with Soto won't get it done. And work needs to be done on the bullpen pronto.
Still need a hitter. Either at 1st/3rd or DH, because the current lineup even with Soto won't get it done. And work needs to be done on the bullpen pronto.
The answer to the question "Can people really be that stupid?" is always "Yes."
- batmagadanleadoff
- Posts: 9036
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 10:43 am
Re: The Pete Alonso Conundrum
Can't blame the Alonso camp if they end up getting a better deal from some team other than the Mets.Lefty Specialist wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 2:56 pm Don't want to talk about him in the past tense yet, but there was a deal for Alonso to be had. If they didn't get it done, I'll bet it was more on Boras/Alonso than the Mets.
Re: The Pete Alonso Conundrum
It'd be a pretty big bummer to see him wearing someone else's colors in 2025. Especially if the intent is to not sign Bregman or Santander and just go with the cheaper in-house options (Acuna, Mauricio, Baty), none of which have a proven MLB track record.
So we're potentially plus Soto but minus Alonso, and JD Martinez's numbers. And the rotation is a downgrade from the 2024 rotation, at least on paper. So I'm not getting a warm fuzzy from this one
So we're potentially plus Soto but minus Alonso, and JD Martinez's numbers. And the rotation is a downgrade from the 2024 rotation, at least on paper. So I'm not getting a warm fuzzy from this one
Re: The Pete Alonso Conundrum
Blue Jays are looking to win this season. They are still in the Sasaki derby. You might hear some Vlad trade rumors at the deadline this season but not now
I'm expecting the Mets to sign Anthony Santander
At that point it becomes Pete are you on board or not?
I'm expecting the Mets to sign Anthony Santander
At that point it becomes Pete are you on board or not?
Diabetic Squirrel
- batmagadanleadoff
- Posts: 9036
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 10:43 am
Re: The Pete Alonso Conundrum
If you wanna blame, blame eff Wilpon for selling out the Mets future. Alonso shouldn't even be a free agent this off-season.batmagadanleadoff wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 3:29 pmCan't blame the Alonso camp if they end up getting a better deal from some team other than the Mets.Lefty Specialist wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 2:56 pm Don't want to talk about him in the past tense yet, but there was a deal for Alonso to be had. If they didn't get it done, I'll bet it was more on Boras/Alonso than the Mets.
Re: The Pete Alonso Conundrum
It's been like 5 years. wtf cares about the Wilpons? It's 2025, if they don't want to 'overpay' Alonso, that's a decision, but it's not super useful to armchair GM the way you think things happened 6 years ago.batmagadanleadoff wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 3:36 pmIf you wanna blame, blame eff Wilpon for selling out the Mets future. Alonso shouldn't even be a free agent this off-season.batmagadanleadoff wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 3:29 pmCan't blame the Alonso camp if they end up getting a better deal from some team other than the Mets.Lefty Specialist wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 2:56 pm Don't want to talk about him in the past tense yet, but there was a deal for Alonso to be had. If they didn't get it done, I'll bet it was more on Boras/Alonso than the Mets.
- batmagadanleadoff
- Posts: 9036
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 10:43 am
Re: The Pete Alonso Conundrum
It's a factor. It's not the only factor and it's not even the main factor, but it's definitely a factor and something to consider..Buck4Prez wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 4:25 pmIt's been like 5 years. wtf cares about the Wilpons? It's 2025, if they don't want to 'overpay' Alonso, that's a decision, but it's not super useful to armchair GM the way you think things happened 6 years ago.batmagadanleadoff wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 3:36 pmIf you wanna blame, blame eff Wilpon for selling out the Mets future. Alonso shouldn't even be a free agent this off-season.batmagadanleadoff wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 3:29 pm
Can't blame the Alonso camp if they end up getting a better deal from some team other than the Mets.
Not useful to what? Do you think that my post is gonna screw up the Alonso negotiations?
- Marshmallowmilkshake
- Posts: 2566
- Joined: Fri Sep 27, 2019 9:02 pm
- Benjamin Grimm
- Posts: 8764
- Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2018 3:01 pm
Re: The Pete Alonso Conundrum
I am too. But I've survived the departures of Seaver (twice!), Staub, Strawberry, Gooden, Alfonzo, Reyes, deGrom and others, so if Pete goes life will go on.Marshmallowmilkshake wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 4:37 pm I am hoping this is just some hardball negotiating.
But yes, I do hope this is just posturing on the Mets' part. And it may well be.
- Centerfield
- Posts: 3130
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 9:28 am
Re: The Pete Alonso Conundrum
I take all of this with a grain of salt. The Mets front office doesn't leak. So figure everything you're hearing is coming from Boras, especially since Heyman is one of the guys reporting this. Stearns/Mets don't benefit in any way from news that they are pivoting to plan B. Boras does. The news comes out. Mets fans get outraged. Boras tries to use that to ramp up the pressure on the Mets.
When the Soto saga was going on, the numbers were leaked constantly. Because it benefited Boras/Soto to have the numbers floated around so teams would increase their bids. With Pete's side, it's been a week and there's been no release of Pete's demands. This suggests that Boras doesn't want those numbers to be known.
I think this is all a negotiation ploy, and that eventually the two sides will agree upon a deal.
When the Soto saga was going on, the numbers were leaked constantly. Because it benefited Boras/Soto to have the numbers floated around so teams would increase their bids. With Pete's side, it's been a week and there's been no release of Pete's demands. This suggests that Boras doesn't want those numbers to be known.
I think this is all a negotiation ploy, and that eventually the two sides will agree upon a deal.
Re: The Pete Alonso Conundrum
When Strawberry left for L.A. it was the same kind of sentiment. In retrospect it was the right move. Straw had one good year and then pfft. I’m as big an Alonso fan as there is, but you know sometimes you gotta just cut bait.
- Frayed Knot
- Posts: 15145
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 3:12 pm
Re: The Pete Alonso Conundrum
The Mets made what they perceived as a last-ditch effort to sign Pete Alonso by offering him a three-year contract in the $68 million to $70 million range and, when that was rejected, began their pivot away from their slugging first baseman, The Post has learned.
The Mets did not send out a statement that the Alonso Era was done. But they have come to believe – without some unexpected late reversal — that it is.
Joel Sherman -- https://nypost.com/2025/01/16/sports/wh ... roke-down/
Not sounding too much like a negotiation ploy.
The Mets did not send out a statement that the Alonso Era was done. But they have come to believe – without some unexpected late reversal — that it is.
Joel Sherman -- https://nypost.com/2025/01/16/sports/wh ... roke-down/
Not sounding too much like a negotiation ploy.
Posting Covid-19 free since March of 2020
Re: The Pete Alonso Conundrum
Damn, that looks like an offer he has to reject
- metsmarathon
- Posts: 2230
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 9:35 pm
Re: The Pete Alonso Conundrum
Damn.
I mean, if you look at FanGraphs value tab, he’s barely a $20M player so perhaps that’s actually fair. I think him in the lineup would some compounding impact above that, especially batting behind Soto.
But gosh it’s hard to look at that and then go say pay him $30M.
Irrespective of that… I still want him back. $27 for one and see how it goes.
I mean, if you look at FanGraphs value tab, he’s barely a $20M player so perhaps that’s actually fair. I think him in the lineup would some compounding impact above that, especially batting behind Soto.
But gosh it’s hard to look at that and then go say pay him $30M.
Irrespective of that… I still want him back. $27 for one and see how it goes.
- Frayed Knot
- Posts: 15145
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 3:12 pm
Re: The Pete Alonso Conundrum
OTOH, it's tough to see how one or more of the teams labeled as interested are going to get into a bidding war and top the Mets offer, at least not by much.
And if the ultimate winning bid does only top it by a bit is Pete going to take it just because it's the highest so as to prove some kind of point? Or because of pressure from Boras/MLBPA to never settle for less than top offer?
There's a saying about how the decisions you make strictly for the most money often are the ones that make you less happy. Given Pete's stated position that he wanted to remain in New York, will he ultimately swallow hard and accept the offer from the Mets even though it's four years shorter and less than half as lucrative as the one he rejected in 2023?
And if the ultimate winning bid does only top it by a bit is Pete going to take it just because it's the highest so as to prove some kind of point? Or because of pressure from Boras/MLBPA to never settle for less than top offer?
There's a saying about how the decisions you make strictly for the most money often are the ones that make you less happy. Given Pete's stated position that he wanted to remain in New York, will he ultimately swallow hard and accept the offer from the Mets even though it's four years shorter and less than half as lucrative as the one he rejected in 2023?
Posting Covid-19 free since March of 2020
- batmagadanleadoff
- Posts: 9036
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 10:43 am
Re: The Pete Alonso Conundrum
Wasn't it reported that the Mets offered 3/90? I guess that was incorrect.
- The Hot Corner
- Posts: 1206
- Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2019 4:15 pm
- Location: North Carolina
Re: The Pete Alonso Conundrum
Yup. I say offer him $78 mil. for 3 years* with opt out after both year 1 and 2. If that isn't good enough, then good luck in the future.
*Of course, it's not my money so it's easy to up the reported offer.
When did the choices get so hard
With so much more at stake
Life gets mighty precious
When there's less of it to waste
With so much more at stake
Life gets mighty precious
When there's less of it to waste
Re: The Pete Alonso Conundrum
For all of Pete's self-professed Mets love over the years, don't forget that he rejected a $150+ million dollar offer during the summer of 2023 so that he could play the market. I loved rooting for the guy but he dug his own hole here by getting progressively worse for the last couple of seasons and holding out for the big payday. I'm sure the MLBPA and his agency has a role in that decision too, but, ultimately, some people actually do take less money to play where they already love playing. And some are Pete. There, I said it.
I think the Mets pivot and spend and still upgrade the roster before opening day 2025. I know they want to see what they have in some of the younger bats but the Cohen regime generally has been willing to spend on positional help. They did it very late in the game last spring with the J.D. signing and I think hopefully they learned not to let things linger on so long - get these guys situated in time for a proper spring training at least.
I think the Mets pivot and spend and still upgrade the roster before opening day 2025. I know they want to see what they have in some of the younger bats but the Cohen regime generally has been willing to spend on positional help. They did it very late in the game last spring with the J.D. signing and I think hopefully they learned not to let things linger on so long - get these guys situated in time for a proper spring training at least.
Re: The Pete Alonso Conundrum
Yeah I agree with Fman , I don't feel bad for Pete , but damn that deal must be looking mighty fine right now , should have been smart like Nimmo
Re: The Pete Alonso Conundrum
NY Post says today Alonso was offered 68-70 for 3 years
And the Mets pivoted to Winker
Sporting news is running Vladdy rumors to the Mets
And the Mets pivoted to Winker
Sporting news is running Vladdy rumors to the Mets
Diabetic Squirrel
- Benjamin Grimm
- Posts: 8764
- Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2018 3:01 pm
Re: The Pete Alonso Conundrum
Vlad will come at a steep price in young players. I would only do it if there's a negotiating window.
I don't see it happening.
I don't see it happening.
Re: The Pete Alonso Conundrum
Martino went on that the Mets are done on Alonso
They've signed Winker and now maybe a reliever, a top one
Who knows but Pete's price seems to be going down?
They've signed Winker and now maybe a reliever, a top one
Who knows but Pete's price seems to be going down?
Diabetic Squirrel
Re: The Pete Alonso Conundrum
Well, there doesn't seem to be much of a market for him, maybe now with the Mets supposedly out a market will develop?