Puma: Mets pitching is totally 👌

Post Reply
User avatar
Johnny Lunchbucket
Posts: 11619
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 8:02 am

Puma: Mets pitching is totally 👌

Post by Johnny Lunchbucket » Sun Jan 28, 2024 4:11 pm

Lets call this a sunny take.

Megill throwing an "elite" splitter!

Severino pushing harder!

Manaea improving velocity!

Houser: a throwback!

Quintana: Impressive work ethic!


https://nypost.com/2024/01/27/sports/me ... -rotation/
User avatar
metirish
Posts: 5007
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 12:50 pm

Re: Puma: Mets pitching is totally 👌

Post by metirish » Sun Jan 28, 2024 4:22 pm

Nothing like Spring Training coming up for articles like this , guys are really giving it their all , anyway , I am looking forward to seeing what if anything Severino has
User avatar
Benjamin Grimm
Posts: 8615
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2018 3:01 pm

Re: Puma: Mets pitching is totally 👌

Post by Benjamin Grimm » Sun Jan 28, 2024 4:32 pm

I'm feeling a bit optimistic about Manaea. I think he'll be at least as useful as Taijuan Walker was.
User avatar
Cowtipper
Posts: 2178
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2023 2:06 pm

Re: Puma: Mets pitching is totally 👌

Post by Cowtipper » Sun Jan 28, 2024 4:41 pm

No superstars, but a bunch of solid players who could go either way. I'm also intrigued by Mike Vasil and another guy, Dominic Hamel, who was 8-6 with 160 Ks in 124 innings for Binghamton. He can't be that far off from the majors, either. And you can't forget Butto, who impressed last year.

Actually, I just looked at their roster and it could be a fun team to watch in 2024.
User avatar
Johnny Lunchbucket
Posts: 11619
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 8:02 am

Re: Puma: Mets pitching is totally 👌

Post by Johnny Lunchbucket » Sun Jan 28, 2024 5:14 pm

Yes that article reminded me Butto exists. Hopefully he can cut down on the walks
User avatar
Frayed Knot
Posts: 15009
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 3:12 pm

Re: Puma: Mets pitching is totally 👌

Post by Frayed Knot » Sun Jan 28, 2024 6:36 pm

I bet they're all in the best shape of their lives too!!
Posting Covid-19 free since March of 2020
User avatar
Cowtipper
Posts: 2178
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2023 2:06 pm

Re: Puma: Mets pitching is totally 👌

Post by Cowtipper » Sun Jan 28, 2024 9:51 pm

At any given moment, the Mets always seem to have a bunch of pitchers that would make killer 3 and 4 guys on another team in any other year. That is, they always seem loaded with guys who have the potential for 10-12 wins and a decent ERA and 100-110 ERA+. Yet those guys never seem to click at the same time, or they mysteriously get injured, or they decide enter their decline once they put on a Mets uniform.

Right now, the guys the Mets have that fit that description are Severino, Quintana, Manaea, Houser and Lucchesi. One day they'll actually use Lucchesi and we can see what he can actually do. Peterson I'd say has the potential, but he continually underachieves. Butto also has the potential, insofar as he hasn't done poorly at any given instant to make me think otherwise. I don't think Megill will ever be that guy, not in a Mets uniform.

If those names were on the Braves, I bet they'd win 15 games each.
User avatar
Edgy MD
Posts: 32633
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 3:36 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD, USA
Contact:

Re: Puma: Mets pitching is totally 👌

Post by Edgy MD » Sun Jan 28, 2024 10:10 pm

Most Major League starting pitchers that ever existed, though, fit the definition of "pitchers that would make killer 3 and 4 guys" to the extent that there is such a thing as a pitcher that's simultaneously "killer" while not qualifying for one of the first two slots in his team's rotation.
User avatar
Cowtipper
Posts: 2178
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2023 2:06 pm

Re: Puma: Mets pitching is totally 👌

Post by Cowtipper » Sun Jan 28, 2024 10:18 pm

Killer for a #3 or 4 guy implying that he would actually be a net positive for the team, rather than someone just eating innings. 2022's Carlos Carrasco would be a decent example, despite his depressed ERA+.
User avatar
Edgy MD
Posts: 32633
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 3:36 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD, USA
Contact:

Re: Puma: Mets pitching is totally 👌

Post by Edgy MD » Sun Jan 28, 2024 11:49 pm

Well, yeah, they all look better than replacement level, with every reason to think one or two will be better still.
User avatar
Fman99
Posts: 6654
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2018 2:43 pm

Re: Puma: Mets pitching is totally 👌

Post by Fman99 » Mon Jan 29, 2024 7:42 am

Sunny indeed.

I also wonder why Lucchesi is consistently slotted after a bunch of guys with what seem to me to be more questionable pedigrees. Perhaps the Mets have already earmarked him for the Trevor Williams swing role position.
User avatar
MFS62
Posts: 9662
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 8:08 am

Re: Puma: Mets pitching is totally 👌

Post by MFS62 » Mon Jan 29, 2024 9:00 am

On one of his books, Jim Brosnan described Bob Rush as "Just good enough to lose with".

https://www.baseball-reference.com/play ... bo01.shtml

Some of the Mets pitchers might fit that description.

Later
I'm paranoid. But am I paranoid enough?
"Never underestimate the power of stupid people in a large group". George Carlin
I have never insulted anyone. I simply describe them, accurately.
User avatar
whippoorwill
Posts: 4745
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 5:17 pm

Re: Puma: Mets pitching is totally 👌

Post by whippoorwill » Mon Jan 29, 2024 10:27 am

We can’t forget our lousy bullpen, guys. We could have the 1986 pitching staff here but our middle relievers would piss it away.

That’s my number one reason I hate the current trend of five inning starts and giving it all over to lesser pitchers to lose
User avatar
Benjamin Grimm
Posts: 8615
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2018 3:01 pm

Re: Puma: Mets pitching is totally 👌

Post by Benjamin Grimm » Mon Jan 29, 2024 7:11 pm

Of course we have to be skeptical, but I hope it's true that Megill and his new splitter will make him elite. Maybe he'll go from being the Mets' Mike Scott to being the Astros' Mike Scott. (Or perhaps The Office's Michael Scott?)
User avatar
Centerfield
Posts: 3074
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 9:28 am

Re: Puma: Mets pitching is totally 👌

Post by Centerfield » Mon Jan 29, 2024 8:50 pm

Somehow I feel worse after reading that.

I think Senga will be good. Though I think he will regress a bit. I think Quintana can be solid. Same for Manaea. Maybe high 3, low 4 ERA. I think the rest of the rotation kinda looks like a mess.
User avatar
Lefty Specialist
Posts: 5932
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 5:36 pm

Re: Puma: Mets pitching is totally 👌

Post by Lefty Specialist » Mon Jan 29, 2024 9:22 pm

Yeah, this pitching staff will be 'killer' all right. But not in a good way.

Image
The answer to the question "Can people really be that stupid?" is always "Yes."
User avatar
Edgy MD
Posts: 32633
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 3:36 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD, USA
Contact:

Re: Puma: Mets pitching is totally 👌

Post by Edgy MD » Mon Jan 29, 2024 9:55 pm

It don't look killer, but I admire that they've had a strategy and stuck to it. They've topped the rotation with a pair of multiple CYA winners the last two years and it's come up with less than the best results, because an injured Bob Gibson and an injured Kevin Kobel are worth just as much.

So, unless I'm misreading, they are trying to (a) spread their resources around more broadly, and (b) make commitments that will be easier to move on from when one works out and another doesn't.

That may not be the answer either, but it hopefully won't be a step back. They have a farm system that's now generally ranked in the top five — and it might have been number one if they hadn't looked for the instant gratification of trading Pete Crow-Armstrong for Javier Baez. The crew they have may or may not be able to staff the ship effectively until those classes mature, but if they do, those pieces are fungible enough to clear room for anybody who comes through.
Post Reply