Chicago White Sox poll

Benjamin Grimm · Post by **Benjamin Grimm** » Tue Sep 03, 2024 12:37 pm

What do you think?

Benjamin Grimm · Post by **Benjamin Grimm** » Tue Sep 03, 2024 12:38 pm

As I said in the other thread, I'm rooting for the Sox to go no better than 39-123. I want them to have more losses than the 1962 Mets and fewer wins.

G-Fafif · Post by **G-Fafif** » Tue Sep 03, 2024 12:51 pm

I was a little verklempt after the weekend series once I calculated that the 1962 Mets were, at the same spot in their schedules, four games ahead of the 2024 White Sox. My god, the 1962 Mets have never been four games ahead of anybody. I think it made me at least as happy on Sunday as picking up ground on the Braves.

For all their gracious protestations that they want nobody else to carry the onus, I figured the 1962 Mets had carried it long enough. The downside is the 1962 Mets won’t get brought up as readily (usually with fondness) when another team challenges for Worst Ever status, though I’m thinking the White Sox are putting that distinction out of reach.

kcmets · Post by **kcmets** » Tue Sep 03, 2024 12:56 pm

Huge White Sox fan this month. WIN, WIN, WIN!!!!

kcmets · Post by **kcmets** » Tue Sep 03, 2024 12:58 pm

Huge, I tell ya.

Cowtipper · Post by **Cowtipper** » Tue Sep 03, 2024 1:04 pm

Neither of the options match how I feel about it. The 1962 Mets will always be the 1962 Mets, whether they have the record or not. I'm ambivalent to it. It was bound to happen eventually. It's not that I want or do not want it to happen, but it was bound to happen, so why get emotionally involved one way or the other.

Johnny Lunchbucket · Post by **Johnny Lunchbucket** » Tue Sep 03, 2024 1:17 pm

I think its a travesty that any team loses as much as the White Sox will this year. What a kick in the nuts to their fans and the history of the franchise. They should be relegated

kcmets · Post by **kcmets** » Tue Sep 03, 2024 1:22 pm

I'm not emotionally involved. Just playin'...

G-Fafif · Post by **G-Fafif** » Tue Sep 03, 2024 1:26 pm

Marshmallowmilkshake · Post by **Marshmallowmilkshake** » Tue Sep 03, 2024 1:28 pm

The funny part is that they didn't seem all that hapless when I was there. We all have images of the 1962 Mets bumbling and Richie Ashburn "Yo la Tengo" moments and that might be because that's all we know. But it's not like the Sox seemed all that bad. They must be. But they didn't seem bumbling.

G-Fafif · Post by **G-Fafif** » Tue Sep 03, 2024 1:32 pm

One of the telling incidents of a long lifeless season on Sunday (Gary underlined this) was Manaea picking off a runner on a pretty obvious balk move and nobody on the White Sox arguing whatsoever.

MFS62 · Post by **MFS62** » Tue Sep 03, 2024 1:54 pm

My longtime friend's screen name is "Shoeless Don" and he's a lifelong ChiSox fan. I'm not sure if I should call him when they "break" the Mets record or if I should wait for his call
.

Later

metirish · Post by **metirish** » Tue Sep 03, 2024 2:10 pm

I voted for the 1962 Mwts to keep that record , there is no good reason why the Sox are this bad , I guess the Mets then being new and all with the players they had , but this Sox team, wow

Edgy MD · Post by **Edgy MD** » Tue Sep 03, 2024 2:15 pm

Now that the Mets have taken care of business, I can't help but root for sad sacks to turn it around and stick it to the man — any man that isn't my man, of course, but stick it real good.

And yeah, of course they should be relegated and lose their spot in the league to Omaha.

MFS62 · Post by **MFS62** » Tue Sep 03, 2024 2:45 pm

Oh NOOOO, Mr. Bill. Not Omaha.
Later

DocTee · Post by **DocTee** » Tue Sep 03, 2024 6:52 pm

An 0-10 homestand is hard to fathom. They have to play better than .500 from here on in to avoid ignominy.

Centerfield · Post by **Centerfield** » Tue Sep 03, 2024 10:50 pm

22 games left.

8-14 gets them to 39-123.

That would be a .364 win percentage.

Frayed Knot · Post by **Frayed Knot** » Wed Sep 04, 2024 6:14 am

Centerfield wrote: ↑Tue Sep 03, 2024 10:50 pm That would be a .364 win percentage.

Or, as it's know on Chicago's south side: a vast improvement.

DocTee · Post by **DocTee** » Wed Sep 04, 2024 6:23 am

The AL Central is a collective 38 games under .500.

Four of the five teams in that division are currently playing better than .500 ball!

stevejrogers · Post by **stevejrogers** » Wed Sep 04, 2024 8:33 am

It is a bit hyperbolic to say the Red Sox have become Yanquis-like since 2004, it’s more that they’ve continued a stretch of being perennially in the mix for postseason appearances, and constantly refreshing after a blip year or two going back to The Impossible Dream of 1967. Plus they’ve added three more titles to their ledger in those ensuing 20 years.

However, getting the gorilla off the backs of both Chicago teams have not had the same affect on the two Chi-town teams!

Cubs have won 4 postseason games since 2016, all in their attempt to repeat season of 2017 (losing a 5 game NLCS), and only making 2 other postseasons since. Yeah they still have been over .500 and in Wild Card hunts, but they haven’t exactly been a dominant perennial force in the nearly decade since finally clawing back to and winning the World Series the way say a certain New England team has been. Kind of similar to the Mets over the decades now that I think of it.

And then there is the franchise this poll is about.

They got back, and won a World Series before their big brothers did, and were back in the postseason in 2008, though losing the ALDS in 4 games. Then they cratered for much of the 2010s before being resurrected towards the end. Followed by creeping into the COVID postseason and finally winning the Central again in 2021 for the first time since 2008, but lost the ALDS in 4 games. They followed that with a .500 season in 2022, and completely cratered to 101 losses last year, and now we have this season!

batmagadanleadoff · Post by **batmagadanleadoff** » Wed Sep 04, 2024 8:40 am

Fman99 · Post by **Fman99** » Wed Sep 04, 2024 9:20 am

Having an emotional attachments to a bad Mets team from 62 years ago seems a bit daffy to me.

MFS62 · Post by **MFS62** » Wed Sep 04, 2024 9:46 am

Fman99 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 04, 2024 9:20 am Having an emotional attachments to a bad Mets team from 62 years ago seems a bit daffy to me.

Some people have an emotional attachment to their first car. It kept breaking down and was a piece of junk. But you remember it fondly and take offense when someone tells you theirs was shttier.

Later

smg58 · Post by **smg58** » Wed Sep 04, 2024 12:11 pm

I don't even know what to say. Every team goes though down stretches, but this is different. And the White Sox aren't an expansion team, or incapable of buying their way at least up to mediocrity. This is mindblowing.

Edgy MD · Post by **Edgy MD** » Wed Sep 04, 2024 12:48 pm

No matter how much money you have, buying your way to mediocrity is no given. No matter what you bring to the table, 29 other organizations are conspiring to destroy your hopes.

The Mets are a terrific team, but one or two mistakes, one or two injuries, and a few bad breaks, and they could have ended up looking like this.

Every team has a rich owner and is managed by people who want to win, but every day, exactly 50% of the ones that take the field lose.