The Mets may be talking about Jurickson Profar
- Benjamin Grimm
- Posts: 8808
- Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2018 3:01 pm
The Mets may be talking about Jurickson Profar
32 years old next month. He had by far his best season last season in San Diego. (.280/.380/.459 with 24 homers.) Has also played for the Rockies, A's, and Rangers. He hit a three-run homer of Max Scherzer at Citi Field in Game One of the 2022 Wild Card Series. He's played 549 big-league games in the outfield, mostly in left field. Plus 219 games at second base, 104 at shortstop, 89 at third base and 72 at first. He's represented, like seemingly everyone else, by Boras. His nickname is "El Patron".
Re: The Mets may be talking about Jurickson Profar
A good year last year - his other decent years were 5 and 6 years ago.
I don't prefer Profar.
Pass
OE: I preferred Santander, but he just signed with Tarana'.
Later
I don't prefer Profar.
Pass
OE: I preferred Santander, but he just signed with Tarana'.
Later
I'm paranoid. But am I paranoid enough?
"Never underestimate the power of stupid people in a large group". George Carlin
I have never insulted anyone. I simply describe them, accurately.
"Never underestimate the power of stupid people in a large group". George Carlin
I have never insulted anyone. I simply describe them, accurately.
Re: The Mets may be talking about Jurickson Profar
Utility infielder is the only place we don't currently already have a guy without options holding the fort.
Re: The Mets may be talking about Jurickson Profar
If they opt for Profar it means the end of OMG, yes?
Re: The Mets may be talking about Jurickson Profar
A one-year wonder who was a terrible disappoint in the whole decade leading up to that single year.
A former #1 rated prospect who, by and large, has been a total dud relative to what was expected of him.
Stay away.
A former #1 rated prospect who, by and large, has been a total dud relative to what was expected of him.
Stay away.
Re: The Mets may be talking about Jurickson Profar
I believe Vientos has burned his last option. Álvarez is indeed demotable, but even should that come to pass, the current minor conflict of seven outfielders without options is still unchanged.
Re: The Mets may be talking about Jurickson Profar
I only count 6: Nimmo, Siri, Soto, Taylor, Winker, Marte.
It does rankle me a bit that the team only found room to carry one backup infielder last year and is headed there again. I remain hopeful though that without a DH who cannot play in the field (see, e.g., Martinez, Vogelbach) they can use the DH slot as occasional “rest” for the infielders as well.
It does rankle me a bit that the team only found room to carry one backup infielder last year and is headed there again. I remain hopeful though that without a DH who cannot play in the field (see, e.g., Martinez, Vogelbach) they can use the DH slot as occasional “rest” for the infielders as well.
- Lefty Specialist
- Posts: 5963
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 5:36 pm
Re: The Mets may be talking about Jurickson Profar
Ummmmm.....no.
The answer to the question "Can people really be that stupid?" is always "Yes."
Re: The Mets may be talking about Jurickson Profar
This is just a leverage ploy against Boras regarding Bregman/Alonso, I would venture to guess.
Profar is a former Boras client who bounced to other representation last year. Not sure if that matters but it seems like it might here.
Profar is a former Boras client who bounced to other representation last year. Not sure if that matters but it seems like it might here.
- Bob Alpacadaca
- Posts: 457
- Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2021 9:21 pm
Re: The Mets may be talking about Jurickson Profar
Talk no more. He's a Brave.
Re: The Mets may be talking about Jurickson Profar
Three years and $42 million says Passan